EEMA
name pending profile ingest
All ownership figures: tracked 13F managers only, common-stock positions, reporting period Q3 2025
| Quarter | Holders | Δ | Shares | Reported value | New | Exits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | 44 | -1 | 1.59M | $185.69M | +3 | −4 |
| Q1 2026 | 46 | +2 | 4.79M | $458.26M | +4 | −2 |
| Q4 2025 | 44 | +1 | 9.74M | $915.64M | +1 | — |
| Q3 2025 | 4 | 0 | 261.14K | $23.96M | — | — |
| Q2 2025 | 2 | -1 | 4.92K | $406,477 | — | −1 |
| Q1 2025 | 2 | +1 | 63.09K | $4.67M | +1 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 1 | 0 | 37.07K | $2.66M | — | — |
| Q3 2024 | 1 | 0 | 175.66K | $13.76M | — | — |
| Q2 2024 | 1 | — | 12.97K | $940,428 | — | — |
| # | Manager | Shares | Δ shares | Value | Their weight | Held | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgan Stanley ✦ | 143.89K | — | $13.20M | 0.0% | n/c | 1 | SEC ↗ |
| 2 | Morgan Stanley ✦ | 143.89K | — | $13.20M | 0.0% | n/c | 1 | SEC ↗ |
| 3 | Morgan Stanley ✦ | 143.89K | — | $13.20M | 0.0% | n/c | 1 | SEC ↗ |
| 4 | Morgan Stanley ✦ | 143.89K | — | $13.20M | 0.0% | n/c | 1 | SEC ↗ |
| 5 | JPMorgan Chase ✦ | 82.50K | — | $7.57M | 0.0% | n/c | 1 | SEC ↗ |
| 6 | JPMorgan Chase ✦ | 82.50K | — | $7.57M | 0.0% | n/c | 1 | SEC ↗ |
| 7 | JPMorgan Chase ✦ | 82.50K | — | $7.57M | 0.0% | n/c | 1 | SEC ↗ |
| 8 | JPMorgan Chase ✦ | 82.50K | — | $7.57M | 0.0% | n/c | 1 | SEC ↗ |
| 9 | Citadel Advisors ✦ | 32.73K | +707.7% | $3.00M | 0.0% | ▲ Add | 6 | SEC ↗ |
| 10 | Fidelity (FMR) ✦ | 2.02K | +132.2% | $185,826 | 0.0% | ▲ Add | 2 | SEC ↗ |
“Their weight” = the position's share of that manager's reported 13F equity value — the conviction measure. ✦ = curated manager.
New buyers
| No new tracked buyers this quarter. |
Exited
| No tracked exits this quarter. |
Full-market context: across ALL 13F filers (SEC structured data, Q1 2026): 160 holders, 8.21M shares, $717.77M reported. This is a different, older period than the tracked-universe figures above and the two are never mixed.
What else this security's tracked holders most often hold — shared-ownership counts, not fundamental relationships.